When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Batson v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batson_v._Kentucky

    Alabama (1965) Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that a prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge in a criminal case—the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so—may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race.

  3. Padilla v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padilla_v._Kentucky

    VI, XIV. Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise noncitizen clients about the deportation risks of a guilty plea. The case extended the Supreme Court's prior decisions on criminal defendants' Sixth Amendment right to counsel ...

  4. Carter v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_v._Kentucky

    Carter v. Kentucky[1][2] was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that trial judges in criminal proceedings must, upon proper request of the defendant, inform the jury of his right against self-incrimination, and that its execution may not be used against him. Carter vs. Kentucky. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued January 14, 1981.

  5. Peremptory challenge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peremptory_challenge

    In law, the right of peremptory challenge is a right in jury selection for the attorneys to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason. Other potential jurors may be challenged for cause, i.e. by giving a good reason why they might be unable to reach a fair verdict, but the challenge will be considered by the presiding judge and may be denied.

  6. Jury nullification in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification_in_the...

    In the 1794 case Georgia v.Brailsford, the Supreme Court directly tried a common law case before a jury.The facts in the case were not in dispute, and the legal opinion of the court was unanimous, but the Court was nonetheless obligated under the Seventh Amendment to refer the matter to the jury for a general verdict.

  7. Continuance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuance

    Continuance. In American procedural law, a continuance is the postponement of a hearing, trial, or other scheduled court proceeding at the request of either or both parties in the dispute, or by the judge sua sponte. In response to delays in bringing cases to trial, some states have adopted "fast-track" rules that sharply limit the ability of ...

  8. Stanford v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_v._Kentucky

    VIII, XIV. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime. [1] This decision came one year after Thompson v.

  9. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us