When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: examples of norm breaching evidence in california civil action case

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rochin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochin_v._California

    Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that added behavior that "shocks the conscience" into tests of what violates due process clause of the 14th Amendment. [1]

  3. Summers v. Tice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_v._Tice

    Decided November 17, 1948; Full case name: Charles A. Summers v. Howard W. Tice, et al. Citation(s) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1: Holding; When a plaintiff suffers a single indivisible injury, for which the negligence of each of several potential tortfeasors could have been a but-for cause, but only one of which could have actually been the cause, all the potential tortfeasors are jointly and ...

  4. Brady disclosure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_disclosure

    Greene, "Thus the term 'Brady violation' is sometimes used to refer to any breach of the broad obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence – that is, to any suppression of so-called 'Brady material' – although strictly speaking, there is never a real 'Brady violation' unless the nondisclosure was so serious that there is a reasonable ...

  5. Breaching experiment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaching_experiment

    In the fields of sociology and social psychology, a breaching experiment is an experiment that seeks to examine people's reactions to violations of commonly accepted social rules or norms. Breaching experiments are most commonly associated with ethnomethodology, and in particular the work of Harold Garfinkel.

  6. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    Case history; Prior history: Review granted, California Court of Appeal decision depublished: Subsequent history: Remanded back to Court of Appeal for further proceedings: Holding; Plaintiff stated a cause of action in lack of informed consent and breach of fiduciary duty, but not in conversion: Court membership; Chief Justice: Malcolm M. Lucas ...

  7. A judge on Tuesday ordered Southern California Edison to preserve data, equipment and evidence related to the deadly Eaton fire, a decision praised by attorneys who sued the giant utility company ...

  8. People v. Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Anderson

    The People of the State of California v. Robert Page Anderson, 493 P.2d 880, 6 Cal. 3d 628 (Cal. 1972), was a landmark case in the state of California that outlawed capital punishment for nine months until the enactment of a constitutional amendment reinstating it, Proposition 17.

  9. California just made it harder to use rap lyrics as criminal ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-just-made-harder-rap...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us