Ads
related to: federal question court cases
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Congress eliminated the requirement in actions against the United States in 1976 and in all federal question cases in 1980. Therefore, a federal court can hear a federal question case even if no money is sought by the plaintiff. To meet the requirement of a case "arising under" federal law, the federal question must appear on the face of the ...
(1) Whether a post-removal amendment of a complaint to omit federal questions defeats federal-question subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to ; and (2) whether such a post-removal amendment of a complaint precludes a district court from exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's remaining state-law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C ...
It is well-established that Congress may grant lower federal courts less than the totality of Article III's possible federal question jurisdiction; for example, before 1980, federal question jurisdiction had an amount in controversy requirement, similar to the requirement that still exists in diversity cases.
In the latter case, future federal courts would be required to follow the state's precedents, although a final judgment in the "guessed" case would not be reopened. Alternatively, federal courts can certify questions to a state supreme court, so long as the state itself has a procedure in place to allow this. For example, some federal district ...
The Court affirmed the Sixth Circuit and ruled that there was federal question jurisdiction. Justice Souter, writing for a unanimous court, held that the federal court had jurisdiction for the following reasons: Whether Grable was given notice within the meaning of the federal statute was an essential element of the claim.
The Supreme Court on June 28, 2024, ruled in favor of a participant in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot who challenged his conviction for a federal obstruction crime. The case stemmed from a lawsuit ...