When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v...

    The decision articulated a doctrine known as "Chevron deference". [2] Chevron deference consisted of a two-part test that was deferential to government agencies: first, whether Congress has spoken directly to the precise issue at question, and second, "whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute".

  3. United States v. Mead Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Mead_Corp.

    United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the issue of when Chevron deference should be applied. In an 8–1 majority decision, the Court determined that Chevron deference applies when Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force ...

  4. What it means for the Supreme Court to throw out Chevron ...

    www.aol.com/news/means-supreme-court-throw...

    The court's 6-3 ruling on Friday overturned a 1984 decision colloquially known as Chevron that has instructed lower courts to defer to federal agencies when laws passed by Congress are not crystal ...

  5. Column: With its 'Chevron' ruling, the Supreme Court claims ...

    www.aol.com/news/column-chevron-ruling-supreme...

    The original Chevron ruling was 6 to 0 (three justices didn't participate — two because of illness and the third, Sandra Day O'Connor, recused herself because of a conflict of interest).

  6. The Supreme Court’s ‘Chevron’ ruling is an existential threat ...

    www.aol.com/finance/supreme-court-chevron-ruling...

    The Supreme Court's decision last month to overturn a decades-old decision that gave regulators more leeway to set rules will harm innovation and threaten U.S. economic vitality, according to ...

  7. Skidmore v. Swift & Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skidmore_v._Swift_&_Co.

    A two-part analysis was born from the Chevron decision (called the "Chevron two-step test") in which a reviewing court first determined whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress was clear, that was the end of the matter because the court and the agency must give effect to the unambiguously ...

  8. National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that decisions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on how to regulate Internet service providers are eligible for Chevron deference, in which the judiciary defers to an administrative agency's expertise under its governing ...

  9. images.huffingtonpost.com

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2012-08-30-3258_001.pdf

    Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM