When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Coleman v Attridge Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coleman_v_Attridge_Law

    Coleman v Attridge Law (2008) C-303/06 (and AG Opinion) is an employment law case heard by the European Court of Justice.The question is whether the European Union's discrimination policy covers not just people who are disabled (or have a particular sex, race, religion, belief and age) but people who suffer discrimination because they are related or connected to disabled people.

  3. Declaration of Principles on Equality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Principles...

    The need to formulate general legal principles on equality was defined on the basis of (i) acknowledging the pervasiveness of discrimination and the weaknesses in the protection of the right to equality at both international and national levels, (ii) the absence of comprehensive equality legislation in many countries around the world and the recognition that such legislation is necessary to ...

  4. Maguire v Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maguire_v_Sydney...

    Maguire v SOCOG 1999 was a decision of the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, which ruled on 18 October 1999 that a blind man had been directly discriminated against by the failure of a government agency to provide ticketing materials for the Sydney Olympic Games in braille.

  5. Disparate treatment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_treatment

    The analysis is as follows: [10] (1) The plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination. (2) The employer must then articulate, through admissible evidence, a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions. (3) To prevail, the plaintiff must prove that the employer's stated reason is a pretext to hide discrimination.

  6. Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause

    Congressman John Bingham of Ohio was the principal framer of the Equal Protection Clause.. Though equality under the law is an American legal tradition arguably dating to the Declaration of Independence, [5] formal equality for many groups remained elusive.

  7. Boy Scouts of America v. Dale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_Scouts_of_America_v._Dale

    Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court, decided on June 28, 2000, that held that the constitutional right to freedom of association allowed the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to exclude a homosexual person from membership in spite of a state law requiring equal treatment of homosexuals in public accommodations.

  8. Katzenbach v. McClung - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katzenbach_v._McClung

    Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which unanimously held that Congress acted within its power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in forbidding racial discrimination in restaurants as this was a burden to interstate commerce.

  9. Ricci v. DeStefano - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_v._DeStefano

    Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009), is a United States labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on unlawful discrimination through disparate impact under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.