Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Questionable sources are likely to be deleted because they're unlikely to be reliable. Children's sources, adult new reader sources, and abridged large-print media are questionable and need checking for reliability before being cited. Children's books, adult new reader books, and large-print books are sometimes unreliable.
Children commonly interpret the speaker's history of inaccuracy as a lasting trait and so the speaker is considered an unreliable informant, at least within the domain they have been wrong about. However, under certain conditions, children may excuse a person's past inaccuracy and later trust that person for information.
The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.
Yes, you can encourage your children to read (without going broke). The post 15 Best Websites to Find Free Online Books for Kids appeared first on Reader's Digest.
Fake news websites are those which intentionally, but not necessarily solely, publish hoaxes and disinformation for purposes other than news satire. Some of these sites use homograph spoofing attacks, typosquatting and other deceptive strategies similar to those used in phishing attacks to resemble genuine news outlets. [1] [2] [3]
For more on the trend of churnalism, see Flat Earth News, a book by Nick Davies. Specific examples to treat carefully include: Specific examples to treat carefully include: State-associated or state-controlled news organisations, especially state media in countries with low press freedom , such as the Chinese press agency Xinhua , the North ...
Regular websites are strongly preferred, but exceptions are made for official links when the subject of the article has no other Web presence. As a reliable source: * Sometimes . The official page of a subject may be used as a self-published , primary source , but only if it can be authenticated as belonging to the subject.
It includes personal websites, and books published by vanity presses. Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, and then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources.