Ads
related to: is chatgpt reliable for research presentation pdf notespopai.pro has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
While AI assistants like ChatGPT can provide information to help start the research process, directly using its uncited, unverifiable outputs for Wikipedia articles risks compromising our project's standards of reliability, references, collaborative editing, and ongoing improveability.
The results might come as an unpleasant surprise to Wikipedians and the Wikimedia Foundation, which has consistently sought to present Wikipedia as a more reliable option over LLM-based tools like ChatGPT (see e.g. "In the media" in this Signpost issue:
ChatGPT is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot [2] [3] developed by OpenAI and launched in 2022. It is currently based on the GPT-4o large language model (LLM). ChatGPT can generate human-like conversational responses and enables users to refine and steer a conversation towards a desired length, format, style, level of detail, and language. [4]
Research into automated generation of Wikipedia-like text long predates the current AI boom fueled by the 2022 release of ChatGPT. However, the authors point out that such efforts have "generally focused on evaluating the generation of shorter snippets (e.g., one paragraph), within a narrower scope (e.g., a specific domain or two), or when an explicit outline or reference documents are supplied."
The authors stop short of attempting to use this difference (between generally larger pageview increases in ChatGPT-less languages and generally smaller increases for those where ChatGPT was available) to quantify the overall effect of ChatGPT directly, perhaps because such an estimation would become rather statistically involved and require ...
ChatGPT can also help with market analysis on a limited scope. Pros: The free version of ChatGPT is equipped with numerous features and can help create comprehensive business plans
The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!