When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Loving v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

    Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Mildred and Richard Loving - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_and_Richard_Loving

    The Lovings and ACLU appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Lovings did not attend the oral arguments in Washington, but their lawyer, Bernard S. Cohen, conveyed a message from Richard Loving to the court: "[T]ell the Court I love my wife, and it is just unfair that I can't live with her in Virginia." [21] The case, Loving v ...

  4. Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-miscegenation_laws_in...

    In 1967, 17 Southern states plus Oklahoma still enforced laws prohibiting marriage between whites and non-whites. Maryland repealed its law at the start of Loving v. Virginia in the Supreme Court. After the Supreme Court ruling declaring such laws to be unconstitutional, the laws in the remaining 16 states ceased to be enforceable.

  5. Interracial marriage in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interracial_marriage_in...

    Interracial marriage has been legal throughout the United States since at least the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court (Warren Court) decision Loving v. Virginia (1967) that held that anti-miscegenation laws were unconstitutional via the 14th Amendment adopted in 1868.

  6. Fact check: Richard and Mildred Loving were convicted of ...

    www.aol.com/news/fact-check-richard-mildred...

    The Lovings later won the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Loving v. Virginia, according to the post. More: Fact check: Post comparing Capitol riot to 2018 Kavanaugh protests lacks context. Loving v.

  7. Interracial couples celebrate Loving v. Virginia decision - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/interracial-couples-celebrating...

    It was only 51 years ago that the Supreme Court legalized interracial marriage. Skip to main content. Sign in. Mail. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ...

  8. Substantive due process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

    Following the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause prompted substantive due process interpretations to be urged on the Supreme Court as a limitation on state legislation. Initially, however, the Supreme Court rejected substantive due process as it came to be understood, including in the seminal Slaughter-House Cases. [18]

  9. Loving v. Virginia legalized interracial marriage nationwide ...

    www.aol.com/loving-v-virginia-legalized...

    Virginia fought it to the U.S. Supreme Court — which ruled in 1967, nine years after the Lovings married, that the state’s law was unconstitutional. Virginia was one of 16 states that still ...