When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shunting yard algorithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunting_yard_algorithm

    To convert, the program reads each symbol in order and does something based on that symbol. The result for the above examples would be (in reverse Polish notation) "3 4 +" and "3 4 2 1 − × +", respectively. The shunting yard algorithm will correctly parse all valid infix expressions, but does not reject all invalid expressions.

  3. Stack-oriented programming - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack-oriented_programming

    For example, postfix notation would be written 2, 3, multiply instead of multiply, 2, 3 (prefix or Polish notation), or 2 multiply 3 (infix notation). The programming languages Forth, Factor, RPL, PostScript, BibTeX style design language [2] and many assembly languages fit this paradigm.

  4. Infix notation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infix_notation

    In geometry, perpendicular lines a and b are denoted , and in projective geometry two points b and c are in perspective when while they are connected by a projectivity when . Infix notation is more difficult to parse by computers than prefix notation (e.g. + 2 2) or postfix notation (e.g. 2 2 + ).

  5. Increment and decrement operators - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Increment_and_decrement...

    The concept was introduced in the B programming language circa 1969 by Ken Thompson. [16] Thompson went a step further by inventing the ++ and -- operators, which increment or decrement; their prefix or postfix position determines whether the alteration occurs before or after noting the value of the operand.

  6. SKI combinator calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SKI_combinator_calculus

    AS: (A → (B → C)) → ((A → B) → (A → C)). Function application corresponds to the rule modus ponens: MP: from A and A → B, infer B. The axioms AK and AS, and the rule MP are complete for the implicational fragment of intuitionistic logic. In order for combinatory logic to have as a model:

  7. Common operator notation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_operator_notation

    In programming languages where assignment is implemented as an operator, that operator is often right-associative. If so, a statement like a := b := c would be equivalent to a := (b := c), which means that the value of c is copied to b which is then copied to a. An operator which is non-associative cannot compete for operands with operators of ...

  8. Naming convention (programming) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Naming_convention_(programming)

    By convention, this prefix is only used in cases when the identifier would otherwise be either a reserved keyword (such as for and while), which may not be used as an identifier without the prefix, or a contextual keyword (such as from and where), in which cases the prefix is not strictly required (at least not at its declaration; for example ...

  9. Stack (abstract data type) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_(abstract_data_type)

    Expressions can be represented in prefix, postfix or infix notations and conversion from one form to another may be accomplished using a stack. Many compilers use a stack to parse syntax before translation into low-level code. Most programming languages are context-free languages, allowing them to be parsed with stack-based machines.