When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court opinions involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982) – The death penalty is unconstitutional for a person who is a minor participant in a felony and does not kill, attempt to kill, or intend to kill. Tison v. Arizona , 481 U.S. 137 (1987) – Death penalty may be imposed on a felony-murder defendant who was a major participant in the underlying felony and exhibits ...

  3. 1972 California Proposition 17 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_California_Proposition_17

    Proposition 17 of 1972 was a measure enacted by California voters to reintroduce the death penalty in that state. The California Supreme Court had ruled on February 17, 1972, that capital punishment was contrary to the state constitution. Proposition 17 amended the Constitution of California in order to overturn that decision.

  4. Capital punishment in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the...

    Vermont has abolished the death penalty for all crimes, but has an invalid death penalty statue for treason. [87] When it abolished the death penalty in 2019, New Hampshire explicitly did not commute the death sentence of the sole person remaining on the state's death row, Michael K. Addison. [88] [89]

  5. Capital punishment debate in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_debate...

    The United States executed zero people from 1968 to 1976. The anti-death penalty movement's biggest victory of this time period was the Supreme Court Case, Furman v. Georgia, of 1972. The Supreme Court found the current state of the death penalty unconstitutional due to its "arbitrary and discriminatory manner" of application. [7]

  6. Capital punishment in California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in...

    On April 24, 1972, the Supreme Court of California ruled in People v. Anderson that the state's current death penalty laws were unconstitutional. Justice Marshall F. McComb was the lone dissenter, arguing that the death penalty deterred crime, noting numerous Supreme Court precedents upholding the death penalty's constitutionality, and stating that the legislative and initiative processes were ...

  7. Capital punishment by the United States federal government

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_the...

    If the state has no death penalty, the judge must select a state with the death penalty for carrying out the execution. [37] The federal government has a facility and regulations only for executions by lethal injection, but the United States Code allows U.S. Marshals to use state facilities and employees for federal executions. [38] [39]

  8. Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Death_Penalty...

    The Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act is a proposed United States law that would abolish the death penalty for all federal crimes and all military crimes. If enacted, this act would mark the first time since 1988 where no federal crimes carry a sentence of death.

  9. People v. Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Anderson

    McComb also argued that the death penalty deterred crime, noting numerous Supreme Court precedents upholding the death penalty's constitutionality, and stating that the legislative and initiative processes were the only appropriate avenues to determine whether the death penalty should be allowed. [1]