Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The doctrine of "no-work-no-pay" is a fundamental axiom in industrial relations. The philosophy are very simple. When a person is employed, it is expected that the work assigned will be carried out. When this work is not done, the employee is not eligible for payment of any salary. [5]
The LOF is called "open" because it specifies no particular sum for the salvage job. Indeed it may not specify a sum, as salvage is not a "contract for services", [ 2 ] but an agreement to provide a service in the hope of a "reward" to be determined later by an arbitration hearing in London, where several KCs practising at the Admiralty Bar ...
The International Convention on Salvage [1] [2] is a treaty that was concluded in London on 28 April 1989 that replaced the Brussels Convention on Assistance and Salvage at Sea as the principal multilateral document governing marine salvage.
"You shall not be entitled to wages from 09.09.2024 to the date you report back to work on 'No work No Pay' basis," said the email, seen by Reuters.
Where the contract of employment is not fulfilled or work is not done as prescribed, the principle of 'no work no pay' is brought into play. In the Labour Law 2021, the government has approved an overtime payment to the employees working more than 15 minutes of scheduled shift.
The FTC found as shown the use of non-compete clauses by employers has negatively affected competition in labor markets, resulting in reduced wages for workers across the labor force—including workers not bound by non-compete clauses and that by suppressing labor mobility, non-compete clauses have negatively affected competition in product ...
The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution states, "[N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of ...
Under this clause, the contractor could claim a profit allowance for work it already had performed, but not for anticipated profits. However, the company argued that because the Army had failed to include this termination for convenience clause in the contract, the Army's cancellation of the project constituted a breach of contract. The ...