Ad
related to: labour market policies for recovery services
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Active labour market policies are based on the concept of social investment, which rests on the idea of basing decision-making on the welfare of society in quantifiable terms, by increasing the employability, incomes and productivity of economic agents, so this approach interprets state expenditure not as consumption but as an investment that will produce returns on the welfare of individuals.
Unemployment and Active Labour Market Policies, 2011-2015 The Role of Standards in the Provision of Quality Human Services Ireland’s Economic Recovery: Recognising Performance – Finding Shared Goals [ 1 ]
Front page of the National Industrial Recovery Act, as signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on June 16, 1933. The National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA) was a US labor law and consumer law passed by the 73rd US Congress to authorize the president to regulate industry for fair wages and prices that would stimulate economic recovery.
The labor market is being underpinned by very low levels of layoffs, but employers are hesitant to add more workers after a hiring spree during the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Federal, state and local governments added 33,000; professional business services, 26,000; and manufacturing, 22,000. But retail lost 28,000 jobs after seasonal adjustments, a sign that holiday ...
The EPSR is most widely mentioned in the areas of education, anti-discrimination, and active labour market policy. [ 13 ] After the Commission issued a legal package of ESPR, it included three key elements of legal dimensions, content and address of the regulation.
Central Europe's economies are recovering more quickly than expected from the coronavirus pandemic and industrial output is rising, but a chronic shortage of workers that pre-dates the crisis ...
Although employment protection legislation is only one aspect of the wide range of regulatory interventions in the labour market, Nicoletti et al. (2000) find evidence suggesting that, across countries, restrictive regulatory environments in the product market tend to be associated with restrictive employment protection policies.