When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Missouri v. McNeely - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._McNeely

    Missouri v. McNeely , 569 U.S. 141 (2013), was a case decided by United States Supreme Court , on appeal from the Supreme Court of Missouri , regarding exceptions to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution under exigent circumstances .

  3. Exclusionary rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule

    The exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil case, in a grand jury proceeding, or in a parole revocation hearing.. The law in force at the time of the police action, not the time of the attempt to introduce the evidence, controls whether the action is illegal for exclusionary rule purposes.

  4. Public policy doctrines for the exclusion of relevant evidence

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_policy_doctrines...

    A subsequent remedial measure is an improvement, repair, or safety measure made after an injury has occurred. FRE 407 [dead link ‍] prohibits the admission of evidence of subsequent remedial measures to show defendant's (1) negligence; (2) culpable conduct; (3) a defect in defendant's product; (4) defect in the design of defendant's product; or (5) the need for a warning or instruction.

  5. Even when a police search is illegal, prosecutors may still ...

    www.aol.com/even-police-search-illegal...

    Some attorneys and civil liberties advocates emphasize that in an illegal search, even if cops acted in good faith with a warrant, the result is the same: someone’s rights are violated.

  6. Is the Missouri House violating transparency requirements ...

    www.aol.com/news/missouri-house-violating...

    The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District held oral arguments on Tuesday over House Rule 126, which says legislators can “keep constituent case files, and records of the caucus of the ...

  7. Herring v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herring_v._United_States

    Herring was indicted in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (felon in possession of a firearm) and 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) (possession of a controlled substance, viz. methamphetamine) and invoked the exclusionary rule to have both the firearm and drug evidence suppressed.

  8. Don’t be fooled on Missouri Amendment 7: It’s an insider ...

    www.aol.com/don-t-fooled-missouri-amendment...

    What Amendment 7 reveals is that insiders believe if their governing ideas had to compete on a level playing field with a large cross section of Missouri voters, those ideas would lose. Proponents ...

  9. Missouri v. Seibert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._Seibert

    Missouri v. Seibert , 542 U.S. 600 (2004), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that struck down the police practice of first obtaining an inadmissible confession without giving Miranda warnings , then issuing the warnings, and then obtaining a second confession.