Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Several portions of Wikipedia were created as articles copied from traditional encyclopedias, such as from the 1911 Britannica, or generated from a long list of town population-data, but those articles now represent, at most, maybe 10% of the current article base. The remaining bulk of Wikipedia contains random articles added as each subject ...
Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or new information. Per the policy on original research, do not use Wikipedia for any of the following: Primary (original) research, such as proposing theories and solutions, communicating original ideas, offering novel definitions of terms, coining new words, etc.
Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought: all material published by Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable published source. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is whether material can be attributed, not whether it is true. For more details, see Wikipedia:Attribution, which is proposed as policy.
Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia , original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published source exists. [ a ] This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources .
Neither the subject material, nor the size of the entity, nor whether the source is printed on paper or available electronically, nor whether the author is a famous expert, makes any difference (though the last point may affect whether you can cite the self-published source in a Wikipedia article).
The diary will reflect the prejudices of its author, and its author might be unaware of relevant facts. The book and the journal article are secondary sources . These secondary sources have advantages: The authors were not involved in the event, so they have the emotional distance that allows them to analyze the events dispassionately.
The essence of Wikipedia – describes how Wikipedia is the harnessing of the collective intelligence and collaborative efforts of editors who hold opposing points of view, in an attempt to preserve all serious contributions which are reliably sourced. Wikipedia is a volunteer service – discusses how editors on Wikipedia are mainly volunteers ...
As author of the Wikipedia Revolution, Andrew Lih, put it, “what would surely seem to create chaos has actually produced increasingly respected content which has been evaluated and revised by the thousands of visitors to the site over time” [2]. Still, critics claim Wikipedia is inherently unreliable because its open editing allows factual ...