When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses. [1] The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it ...

  3. Open-source license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license

    Popular open source licenses include the Apache License, the MIT License, the GNU General Public License (GPL), the BSD Licenses, the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Open-source licenses are software licenses that allow content to be used, modified, and

  4. License compatibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility

    License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.

  5. Apache License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License

    The Apache Software Foundation and the Free Software Foundation agree that the Apache License 2.0 is a free software license, compatible with the GNU General Public License [5] (GPL) version 3, [2] meaning that code under GPLv3 and Apache License 2.0 can be combined, as long as the resulting software is licensed under the GPLv3. [6]

  6. MIT License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_license

    As of 2020, according to WhiteSource Software [39] the MIT license was used in 27% of four million open source packages. As of 2015 [update] , according to Black Duck Software [ 40 ] [ better source needed ] and a 2015 blog [ 11 ] from GitHub , the MIT license was the most popular open-source license , with the GNU GPLv2 coming second in their ...

  7. Permissive software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_software_license

    The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."

  8. Comparison of integrated development environments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_integrated...

    Juno team merged with VS Code extension team (see below); Juno now in maintenance mode. Emacs / spacemacs: portions in GPL v2, LGPL, BSD and public domain: Yes Yes Yes FreeBSD: Yes Yes ESS extension support for emacs. vi support also available, e.g. in spacemacs (useful for pair programming). Visual Studio Code (using the Julia extension) MIT ...

  9. Comparison of JavaScript charting libraries - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript...

    Apache 2.0 and MIT [90] Yes Yes [91] Yes [92] Yes [93] Yes [94] No No No No No Yes [95] Yes [96] Yes Yes Yes No No Yes [97] Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Vizzu: Apache 2.0 [98] Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Webix JS Charts, part of Webix: GPL [99] Yes Yes [100] No Yes [101] Yes ...