Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Server Side Public License (SSPL) is a source-available copyleft software license introduced by MongoDB Inc. in 2018. [2] [3]It includes most of the text and provisions of the GNU Affero General Public License version 3 (AGPL v3), [4] but modifies its provisions for software that is conveyed over a network—requiring that anyone who offers the functionality of SSPL-licensed software to ...
Polyhedra Lite appeared with a free-to-use license in 2012. [9] Redis: Redis Labs: 2009 C, C++, Python, Lua, C#, etc. [10] Redis Source Available License v2 and the Server Side Public License v1 [11] Redis is a source-available software project that implements data structure servers.
The following table compares various features of each license and is a general guide to the terms and conditions of each license, based on seven subjects or categories. Recent tools like the European Commissions' Joinup Licensing Assistant, [ 10 ] makes possible the licenses selection and comparison based on more than 40 subjects or categories ...
For information on software-related licences, see Comparison of free and open-source software licenses. A variety of free-content licences exist, some of them tailored to a specific purpose. Also listed are open-hardware licences, which may be used on design documents of and custom-made software for open-source hardware .
License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.
An early example of an open-source project that did successfully re-license for license compatibility reasons is the Mozilla project and their Firefox browser. The source code of Netscape's Communicator 4.0 browser was originally released in 1998 under the Netscape Public License/Mozilla Public License [6] but was criticised by the FSF and OSI for being incompatible.
The licenses in the GPL series are all copyleft licenses, which means that any derivative work must be distributed under the same or equivalent license terms. It is more restrictive than the Lesser General Public License , and even further distinct from the more widely used permissive software licenses such as BSD , MIT , and Apache .
In 2000, the "Do What the Fuck You Want To Public License" was released as a public-domain-equivalent license for software. [2] It is distinguished among software licenses by its informal style and lack of a warranty disclaimer. In 2016, according to Black Duck Software, [note 1] the WTFPL was used by less than 1% of FOSS projects.