Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In economics, a government monopoly or public monopoly is a form of coercive monopoly in which a government agency or government corporation is the sole provider of a particular good or service and competition is prohibited by law. It is a monopoly created, owned, and operated by the government.
In monopolistic competition, a company takes the prices charged by its rivals as given and ignores the impact of its own prices on the prices of other companies. [1] [2] If this happens in the presence of a coercive government, monopolistic competition will fall into government-granted monopoly.
This is the main way to distinguish a monopolistic competition market from a perfect competition market. In economics, the idea of monopolies is important in the study of management structures, which directly concerns normative aspects of economic competition, and provides the basis for topics such as industrial organization and economics of ...
In economics, a government-granted monopoly (also called a "de jure monopoly" or "regulated monopoly") is a form of coercive monopoly by which a government grants exclusive privilege to a private individual or firm to be the sole provider of a good or service; potential competitors are excluded from the market by law, regulation, or other mechanisms of government enforcement.
In the short run, economic profit is positive, but it approaches zero in the long run. Firms in monopolistic competition tend to advertise heavily because different firms need to distinguish similar products than others. [16] Examples of monopolistic competition include; restaurants, hair salons, clothing, and electronics.
Imperfect competition usually describes behaviour of suppliers in a market, such that the level of competition between sellers is below the level of competition in perfectly competitive market conditions. [2] The competitive structure of a market can significantly impact the financial performance and conduct of the firms competing within it.
On the other hand, a competitive firm by definition faces a perfectly elastic demand, =, which means that it sets price equal to marginal cost. The rule also implies that, absent menu costs, a monopolistic firm will never choose a point on the inelastic portion of its demand curve.
Although a regulated monopoly will not have a monopoly profit that is high as it would be in an unregulated situation, it still can have an economic profit that is still above what a competitive firm has in a truly competitive market. [2] Government regulations of the price the monopoly can charge reduce the monopoly profit, but do not ...