Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The constants R mod N and R 3 mod N can be generated as REDC(R 2 mod N) and as REDC((R 2 mod N)(R 2 mod N)). The fundamental operation is to compute REDC of a product. When standalone REDC is needed, it can be computed as REDC of a product with 1 mod N. The only place where a direct reduction modulo N is necessary is in the precomputation of R ...
Time-keeping on this clock uses arithmetic modulo 12. Adding 4 hours to 9 o'clock gives 1 o'clock, since 13 is congruent to 1 modulo 12. In mathematics, modular arithmetic is a system of arithmetic for integers, where numbers "wrap around" when reaching a certain value, called the modulus.
Given a curve, E, defined by some equation in a finite field (such as E: y 2 = x 3 + ax + b), point multiplication is defined as the repeated addition of a point along that curve.
The pattern shown by 8 and 16 holds [6] for higher powers 2 k, k > 2: {,}, is the 2-torsion subgroup, so (/) cannot be cyclic, and the powers of 3 are a cyclic subgroup of order 2 k − 2, so: ( Z / 2 k Z ) × ≅ C 2 × C 2 k − 2 . {\displaystyle (\mathbb {Z} /2^{k}\mathbb {Z} )^{\times }\cong \mathrm {C} _{2}\times \mathrm {C} _{2^{k-2}}.}
There are exactly ⌊p/12⌋ supersingular elliptic curves with automorphism groups of order 2. In addition if p≡3 mod 4 there is a supersingular elliptic curve (with j-invariant 1728) whose automorphism group is cyclic or order 4 unless p=3 in which case it has order 12, and if p≡2 mod 3 there is a supersingular elliptic curve (with j ...
A Montgomery curve of equation = + +. A Montgomery curve over a field K is defined by the equation,: = + + for certain A, B ∈ K and with B(A 2 − 4) ≠ 0.. Generally this curve is considered over a finite field K (for example, over a finite field of q elements, K = F q) with characteristic different from 2 and with A ≠ ±2 and B ≠ 0, but they are also considered over the rationals with ...
Clement's congruence-based theorem characterizes the twin primes pairs of the form (, +) through the following conditions: [()! +] ((+)), +P. A. Clement's original 1949 paper [2] provides a proof of this interesting elementary number theoretic criteria for twin primality based on Wilson's theorem.
Using the multiplication table 3 times 7 is 21. Place 21 in rods in the middle, with 1 aligned with the tens place of the multiplier (on top of 7). Then, 3 times 6 equals 18, place 18 as it is shown in the image. With the 3 in the multiplicand multiplied totally, take the rods off. Move the multiplier one place to the right.