Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A method similar to Vieta's formula can be found in the work of the 12th century Arabic mathematician Sharaf al-Din al-Tusi. It is plausible that the algebraic advancements made by Arabic mathematicians such as al-Khayyam, al-Tusi, and al-Kashi influenced 16th-century algebraists, with Vieta being the most prominent among them. [2] [3]
For any (a, b) satisfying the given condition, let k = a 2 + b 2 + 1 / ab and rearrange and substitute to get x 2 − (kb) x + (b 2 + 1) = 0. One root to this quadratic is a, so by Vieta's formulas the other root may be written as follows: x 2 = kb − a = b 2 + 1 / a . The first equation shows that x 2 is an integer and the ...
Using his formula, Viète calculated π to an accuracy of nine decimal digits. [4] However, this was not the most accurate approximation to π known at the time, as the Persian mathematician Jamshīd al-Kāshī had calculated π to an accuracy of nine sexagesimal digits and 16 decimal digits in 1424. [12]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
François Viète (French: [fʁɑ̃swa vjɛt]; 1540 – 23 February 1603), known in Latin as Franciscus Vieta, was a French mathematician whose work on new algebra was an important step towards modern algebra, due to his innovative use of letters as parameters in equations.
Vieta's substitution is a method introduced by François Viète (Vieta is his Latin name) in a text published posthumously in 1615, which provides directly the second formula of § Cardano's method, and avoids the problem of computing two different cube roots.
Google Sheets is a spreadsheet application and part of the free, web-based Google Docs Editors suite offered by Google. Google Sheets is available as a web application; a mobile app for: Android, iOS, and as a desktop application on Google's ChromeOS. The app is compatible with Microsoft Excel file formats. [5]
The total time is 1.1191 + 0.8672 = 1.9863 The conclusion, based on this particular model, is that equation 6 is slightly faster than equation 5, regardless of the fact that equation 6 has more terms. This result is typical of the general trend.