Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Greedy algorithms determine the minimum number of coins to give while making change. These are the steps most people would take to emulate a greedy algorithm to represent 36 cents using only coins with values {1, 5, 10, 20}. The coin of the highest value, less than the remaining change owed, is the local optimum.
Another example is attempting to make 40 US cents without nickels (denomination 25, 10, 1) with similar result — the greedy chooses seven coins (25, 10, and 5 × 1), but the optimal is four (4 × 10). A coin system is called "canonical" if the greedy algorithm always solves its change-making problem optimally.
Kleinberg, J., and Tardos, E. (2005) Algorithm Design, Chapter 1, pp 1–12. See companion website for the Text Archived 2011-05-14 at the Wayback Machine. Knuth, D. E. (1996). Stable Marriage and Its Relation to Other Combinatorial Problems: An Introduction to the Mathematical Analysis of Algorithms. CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes.
To find it, start at such a p 0 containing at least two individuals in their reduced list, and define recursively q i+1 to be the second on p i 's list and p i+1 to be the last on q i+1 's list, until this sequence repeats some p j, at which point a rotation is found: it is the sequence of pairs starting at the first occurrence of (p j, q j ...
In a typical backtracking solution to this problem, one could define a partial candidate as a list of integers c = (c[1], c[2], …, c[k]), for any k between 0 and n, that are to be assigned to the first k variables x[1], x[2], …, x[k]. The root candidate would then be the empty list (). The first and next procedures would then be
In mathematics, economics, and computer science, the Gale–Shapley algorithm (also known as the deferred acceptance algorithm, [1] propose-and-reject algorithm, [2] or Boston Pool algorithm [1]) is an algorithm for finding a solution to the stable matching problem.
Each key pair consists of a public key and a corresponding private key. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Key pairs are generated with cryptographic algorithms based on mathematical problems termed one-way functions . Security of public-key cryptography depends on keeping the private key secret; the public key can be openly distributed without compromising security ...
In 1955, mathematician John Nash wrote a letter to the NSA, speculating that cracking a sufficiently complex code would require time exponential in the length of the key. [5] If proved (and Nash was suitably skeptical), this would imply what is now called P ≠ NP, since a proposed key can be verified in polynomial time.