When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Social judgment theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_judgment_theory

    Social judgment theory represents an attempt to generalize psychophysical judgmental principles and the findings to the social judgment. With the person's preferred position serving as the judgmental anchor, SJT is a theory that mainly focuses on the internal processes of a person's own judgment in regards to the relation within a communicated ...

  3. Muzafer Sherif - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzafer_Sherif

    The social judgement theory examines how the assessment and perception of one's ideas are consistent with current attitudes. As new ideas are present, it is assessed by contrasting with one's current beliefs. Muzafer Sherif examined how one has their own latitudes of perception of their ideas and that may be opposing to others' point of view.

  4. Self-persuasion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-persuasion

    Social judgment theory (SJT) is a persuasion theory proposed by Carolyn Sherif, Muzafer Sherif, and Carl Hovland [17] in 1961, and was defined by Sherif and Sherif as the perception and evaluation of an idea by comparing it with current attitudes. The social judgment theory aims to explain how audiences process messages.

  5. Carolyn Sherif - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolyn_Sherif

    Furthermore, social judgment theory states that the greater the latitude of rejection for an individual (the more positions they object to outside of their own), the more involved that person is assumed to be with that topic (i.e. the stronger their attitude towards the topic), and the harder it will be to persuade them to change their attitude ...

  6. Social intuitionism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_intuitionism

    In moral psychology, social intuitionism is a model that proposes that moral positions are often non-verbal and behavioral. [1] Often such social intuitionism is based on "moral dumbfounding" where people have strong moral reactions but fail to establish any kind of rational principle to explain their reaction.

  7. Moral foundations theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_foundations_theory

    The theory has been developed by a diverse group of collaborators and popularized in Haidt's book The Righteous Mind. [7] The theory proposes that morality is "more than one thing", first arguing for five foundations, and later expanding for six foundations (adding Liberty/Oppression): Care/harm; Fairness/cheating; Loyalty/betrayal; Authority ...

  8. Lorne Michaels Said ‘SNL’ Is ‘Nonpartisan’ and ‘You Can’t Be ...

    www.aol.com/lorne-michaels-said-snl-nonpartisan...

    Samantha Bee is clapping back at “Saturday Night Live” boss Lorne Michaels, who makes a diss at her in his upcoming memoir “Lorne: The Man Who Invented Saturday Night Live.” The former ...

  9. Elaboration likelihood model - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elaboration_likelihood_model

    Social judgment theory – emphasizes the distance in opinions, and whether it is in the "acceptance latitude" or "rejection latitude" or in the intermediate zone. This concept relates to the peripheral processing route because when a person already has a strong opinion on the idea (an anchor), they are more likely to take the peripheral route ...