When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: ambler realty ohio

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_of_Euclid_v...

    Ambler Realty owned 68 acres (0.28 km 2) of land in the village of Euclid, Ohio, a suburb of Cleveland.The village, in an attempt to prevent industrial Cleveland from growing into and subsuming Euclid and to prevent the growth of industry which might change the character of the village, developed a zoning ordinance based upon six classes of use, three classes of height and four classes of area.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 272

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926), is a landmark Supreme Court decision approving the power of local government to establish rules of zoning. The Court's ruling that local ordinance zoning is a valid exercise of the police power bolstered zoning in the United States and influenced other countries.

  4. Zoning in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoning_in_the_United_States

    The constitutionality of zoning ordinances was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926. The zoning ordinance of Euclid, Ohio was challenged in court by a local land owner on the basis that restricting use of property violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Ambler ...

  5. How local zoning laws hurt housing affordability — and what ...

    www.aol.com/finance/local-zoning-laws-hurt...

    Ambler Realty Co. Single-family zoning laws. According to Bankrate’s Home Affordability Survey, more than three-quarters (78 percent) of U.S. adults say they consider owning a home to be part of ...

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Taft Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U.S. 365 (1926) zoning, due process: United States v. General Electric Co. 272 U.S. 476 (1926) patentee who grants a single license to a competitor to manufacture the patented product may lawfully fix the price at which the licensee may sell the product Farrington v. Tokushige: 273 U.S. 284 (1927)

  7. Exclusionary zoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_zoning

    Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. 1926: The Ambler Realty company accused the Village of Euclid of depriving their liberty with its ban on industrial uses. The ban on industry reduced the company's land value from $10,000 down to $2,500 per acre and undermined the company's right to govern its own property. [ 8 ]