Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Our active community of editors uses tools such as the Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages feeds to monitor new and changing content. However, Wikipedia is not uniformly peer reviewed; while readers may correct errors or engage in casual peer review, they have no legal duty to do so and thus all information read here is without any implied warranty of fitness for any purpose or use ...
A disclaimer in a Wikipedia article is a statement or visual template that editors may attempt to insert as a warning to readers. While ideas like this have been continually proposed, the consensus is that disclaimers do not belong in encyclopedia articles and should be deleted.
Wikipedia may contain triggers for people with post-traumatic stress disorder. Wikipedia may contain images and videos which can trigger epileptic seizures and other medical conditions. Since Wikipedia is open to contributions from the public, there may at any time be vandalism present on Wikipedia. There may be medical, legal, or other ...
In patent law, a disclaimer identifies, in a claim, subject-matter that is not claimed. [2] By extension, a disclaimer may also mean the action of introducing a negative limitation in a claim, i.e. "an amendment to a claim resulting in the incorporation therein of a "negative" technical feature, typically excluding from a general feature specific embodiments or areas". [3]
Wikipedia:Purpose – describes Wikipedia's motive for being by its founders. Notes and references ^ Wikipedia's co-founder, Jimmy Wales, has described the original research policy as originating "primarily as a practical means to deal with physics cranks, of which of course there are a number on the web.
Wikipedia editors should not remove material solely because it may be offensive, unpleasant, or unsuitable for some readers. However, this does not mean that Wikipedia should include material simply because it is offensive, nor does it mean that offensive content is exempted from regular inclusion guidelines.
Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought: all material published by Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable published source. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is whether material can be attributed, not whether it is true. For more details, see Wikipedia:Attribution, which is proposed as policy.
Reports have sometimes [citation needed] cited the Wikipedia disclaimers to support claims that Wikipedia is unreliable. Here is a selection from the disclaimers of sources which are often regarded as reliable. Associated Press (disclaimer [original text in all caps]): "The site and the site elements are provided on an 'as is' and 'as available ...