Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The court now considers about 900 appeals per year and accepts review in about one in eight cases. [1] Before the Court of Appeals was created, the Minnesota Supreme Court handled about 1,800 cases a year. Certain appeals can go directly to the Supreme Court, such as those involving taxes, first degree murder, and workers' compensation.
In 1992, the society moved to a new building nearby, the Minnesota History Center. [4] [5] The neoclassical front of the building has eight two-story Ionic columns of granite. Above them are Roman numerals representing the establishment of the Minnesota Historical Society in 1849 and the year the building was completed, 1917. It was dedicated ...
President-elect Trump was sentenced Friday in his hush money conviction, but the judge overseeing the case opted to not impose any punishment in a brief hearing in New York in which Trump and his ...
Whether, even though Congress excluded from list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, a district court may rely on the Section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. October 21, 2024 (February 25, 2025) FCC v. Consumers' Research: 24-354 24-422
More Clay County offices and agencies, including the courts, will begin to reopen Monday. On Friday afternoon, the Clay County Emergency Management Agency announced Clay County Superior Court will ...
The Minnesota State Law Library is a law library operated by the judicial branch of the U.S. state of Minnesota. It is currently housed in the ground level of the Minnesota Judicial Center, which was built in 1915. An expansion of the building was completed in 1990. The Minnesota Judicial Center is adjacent to the State Capitol in St. Paul.
Haslett is currently held on a $500,000 bond in Clay County jail. Angles scheduled a bond hearing on the case to be held in one week, and a preliminary hearing for early December. Woman escapes ...
The Court agreed to hear the case, and oral arguments were heard on February 28, 2018. [2] The Court announced judgment in favor of the voters on June 14, 2018, voting 7–2 to reverse and remand to the lower court because the Minnesota law was an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment.