Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
[99] [100] This has led to the hypothesis that democratic peace emerges as a particular case when analyzing a subset of states which are, in fact, similar. [101] Or, that similarity in general does not solely affect the probability of war, but only coherence of strong political regimes such as full democracies and stark autocracies.
The End of History and the Last Man is a 1992 book of political philosophy by American political scientist Francis Fukuyama which argues that with the ascendancy of Western liberal democracy—which occurred after the Cold War (1945–1991) and the dissolution of the Soviet Union (1991)—humanity has reached "not just ... the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of ...
The democratic peace theory and interactive model of democratic peace [21] argue that democracies have fewer conflicts among themselves. This is seen as contradicting especially the realist theories and this empirical claim is now one of the great disputes in political science. Numerous explanations have been proposed for the democratic peace.
The authors notably find evidence that contradicts the conventional belief that democratic leaders are inherently more pacifistic. The author's findings on the democratic peace are largely derived from their findings in a paper they published three years prior to the publication of their book. [6] Part Three
Never at War: Why Democracies Will Not Fight One Another is a book by the historian and physicist Spencer R. Weart published by Yale University Press in 1998. It examines political and military conflicts throughout human history and finds no exception to one of the claims that is made by the controversial democratic peace theory that well-established liberal democracies have never made war on ...
In Kant's To Perpetual Peace, [14] the philosopher set the way by forming guidelines to create a peace program to be applied by nations. This program would require cooperation between states as well as the mutual pursuit of secure freedom and shared benefits. [15] One such idea was the Democratic Peace Theory. [16]
An historic switch in the presidential ticket. A polling shift. And a still-undefined nominee. That’s the backdrop to this week’s Democratic convention.
Mearsheimer dismisses democratic peace theory, which claims that democracies never or rarely go to war with each other. [20] He also does not believe it to be possible for a state to become a global hegemon. Although that is theoretically possible, there is too much landmass and too many oceans, which he posits as having effective stopping ...