When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Conflicts of interest in academic publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflicts_of_interest_in...

    Conflicts of interest increase the likelihood of biases arising; they can harm the quality of research and the public good (even if disclosed). [3] Conflicts of interest can involve research sponsors, authors, journals, journal staff, publishers, and peer reviewers.

  3. List of scientific misconduct incidents - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific...

    Johnny Matson (US), former professor of psychology at Louisiana State University, who was criticized starting in 2015 for his peer review practices as a journal editor, [123] [124] in 2023 had 24 of his research papers retracted because of undisclosed conflicts of interest, duplicated methodology, and a compromised peer-review process. [125] [126]

  4. Lancet MMR autism fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_MMR_autism_fraud

    Among commentators drawing on Deer's investigation, academic Peter N. Steinmetz summarizes six fabrications and falsifications in the paper itself and in Wakefield's response in the areas of findings of non-specific colitis; behavioral symptoms; findings of regressive autism; ethics consent statement; conflict of interest statement; and methods ...

  5. Andrew Wakefield - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wakefield

    t. e. Andrew Jeremy Wakefield (born 3 September 1956) [ 3 ][ 4 ][ a ] is a British fraudster, discredited academic, anti-vaccine activist, and former physician. He was struck off the medical register for his involvement in The Lancet MMR autism fraud, a 1998 study that fraudulently claimed a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR ...

  6. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the ...

  7. Conflict of interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest

    A widely used definition is: "A conflict of interest is a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgement or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest." [2] Primary interest refers to the principal goals of the profession or activity, such as the protection of clients, the health ...

  8. Publication bias - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publication_bias

    In published academic research, publication bias occurs when the outcome of an experiment or research study biases the decision to publish or otherwise distribute it. Publishing only results that show a significant finding disturbs the balance of findings in favor of positive results. [1] The study of publication bias is an important topic in ...

  9. Predatory publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_publishing

    Predatory publishing, also write-only publishing[1][2] or deceptive publishing, [3] is an exploitative academic publishing business model, where the journal or publisher prioritizes self-interest at the expense of scholarship. It is characterized by misleading information, deviates from the standard peer review process, is highly non ...