When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Quo warranto petition against Maria Lourdes Sereno - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quo_warranto_petition...

    The quo warranto petition against Maria Lourdes Sereno, filed before the Supreme Court of the Philippines, led to the landmark case Republic v. Sereno [note 1] (G. R. No. 237428), [3] [4] [5] which nullified Maria Lourdes Sereno's appointment as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines, finding that she never lawfully held the office due to a lack of integrity for failing to file ...

  3. Trial of Joseph Estrada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Joseph_Estrada

    People of the Philippines v. Joseph Ejercito Estrada, et al. Court: Sandiganbayan: Full case name: People of the Philippines v. Joseph Ejercito Estrada, Jose "Jinggoy" Estrada, Charlie "Atong" Tiu Hay Sy Ang, Edward S. Serapio, Yolanda T. Ricaforte, Alma Alfaro, John Doe also known as Eleuterio Ramos Tan or Mr. Uy, Jane Doe also known as Delia Rajas, John Does and Jane Does

  4. Disini v. Secretary of Justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disini_v._Secretary_of_Justice

    Court: Supreme Court of the Philippines en banc: Full case name; Jose Jesus M. Disini, Jr., Rowena S. Disini, Lianne Ivy P. Medina, Janette Toral and Ernesto Sonido, Jr., vs. the Secretary of Justice, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior and Local Government, the Executive Director of the Information and Communications Technology Office, the Chief of the Philippine National Police ...

  5. Reed v. Town of Gilbert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_v._Town_of_Gilbert

    A municipal ordinance that placed stricter limitations on the size and placement of religious signs than other types of signs was an unconstitutional content-based restriction on free speech. Court membership; Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg

  6. Oposa v. Factoran - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oposa_v._Factoran

    [6] According to Oposa, the case should be called Oposa with Factoran because his friend Kuya Jun Factoran, a human rights lawyer, actually encouraged to sue the government using his name as the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and to include the dozens of children as real-parties-in-interest, while it was the ...

  7. Judiciary of the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_the_Philippines

    [4] [1]: 48 It is the appellate court for cases where "the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question", for the "legality of any tax" and related matters, where the "jurisdiction of any lower court is in ...

  8. People of the Philippines v. Hernandez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    The Court was divided upon the decision, having a vote of 6-4 (one justice died a month before its promulgation). But it was later on accepted as valuable jurisprudence, starting with the subsequent case of People of the Philippines v. Geronimo (100 Phil. Reports 90). The case is now a standard case study in Philippine law schools.

  9. List of Philippine legal terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Philippine_legal_terms

    A case brought under administrative law in the form of a quasi-judicial proceeding by an agency of a non-judicial branch of government, or, the Office of the Court Administrator. Normally, such cases are internal disciplinary matters—court cases criminal and civil can be brought alongside them if warranted. academic N/A: English Moot ...