Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Today, many of Standard Oil's 39 successor entities play roles in the oil industry, either on their own or through being acquired by other companies. Standard Oil of New Jersey, the controlling division of Standard Oil at the time of the 1911 breakup, continues to exist as ExxonMobil, formed from the merger of it and Standard Oil of New York.
Standard Oil is the common name for a corporate trust in the petroleum industry that existed from 1882 to 1911. ... Standard Oil's successors used a chevron logo, ...
The Standard Oil Company (Ohio) was an American petroleum company that existed from 1870 to 1987. The company, known commonly as Sohio , was founded by John D. Rockefeller . [ 4 ] [ 2 ] It was established as one of the separate entities created after the 1911 breakup.
Rockefeller, Andrews & Flagler was a business concern formed in 1867 in Cleveland, Ohio which was a predecessor of the Standard Oil Company.The principals and namesakes were John D. Rockefeller, William Rockefeller, Samuel Andrews, and Henry M. Flagler.
Standard Oil may also refer to one of these successors of the original Standard Oil: Standard Oil of Brazil; Standard Oil of California, later rebranded to Chevron; Standard Oil of Illinois; Standard Oil of Indiana, also called Stanolind, then Amoco, which merged with BP; Standard Oil of Iowa; Standard Oil of Kansas, spun off from Kentucky Standard
Ruth Bedford was the last living heiress of the Standard Oil fortune and was known for trucking around town wearing jeans and driving an old station wagon. This summer, the heiress passed away in ...
The Standard Oil Company of Kentucky was incorporated on October 8, 1886, under Kentucky laws. [2] It was founded as a division of the Standard Oil Trust to handle the assets of the Chess, Carley & Company, which Standard had acquired to handle product marketing and distribution for the southeastern U.S. [citation needed] It maintained corporate offices in all of the states it serviced, and ...
Finding a CEO successor is an expensive undertaking. That’s why, when firms identify a promising successor in-house, they spare no expense to keep them. Goldman Sachs is a prime example.