Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court ruled that the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to legislate for a referendum. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800 ...
Sir James Eadie, for the UK Government, warned against ‘dragging the court into the political process’. Question over indyref2 should not be ‘farmed out’ to Supreme Court, judges told Skip ...
Referring to a Canadian Supreme Court decision, he said: “The court found that Quebec did not meet the threshold of a colonial people or an oppressed people, nor could it be suggested that ...
On 23 November, the Supreme Court ruled that the Scottish Parliament did not have the power to legislate a second independence referendum. Following the Supreme Court decision, the SNP stated that it wanted to amend the Scotland Act 1998 in order to enable the holding of a referendum in 2023. [19] [104]
The case was heard in a virtual hearing of the Court of Session on Tuesday. Decision on indyref2 consent issue needed before election, court hears Skip to main content
The panel of five justices will hand down their decision on Wednesday morning. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in. Mail ...
The former deputy president of the Supreme Court said the judges understood the case’s importance. Supreme Court indyref2 judgment could take ‘six to eight weeks’, Lord Hope says Skip to ...
The Supreme Court's 2014 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning limited the ability of the president to make recess appointments (including appointments to the Supreme Court); the court ruled that the Senate decides when the Senate is in session or in recess. Writing for the court, Justice Breyer stated, "We hold that, for ...