When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparative negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_negligence

    Comparative negligence, called non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury.

  3. Hoffman v. Jones - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoffman_v._Jones

    The Florida Supreme Court adopted the concept of "pure" comparative negligence, which allows a victim to be compensated for the percentage of harm caused by the at-fault person. The decision of the court in Hoffman v. Jones has been cited in law school textbooks, and now the concept of comparative negligence is the prevailing doctrine.

  4. What does no-fault state mean? - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/does-no-fault-state-mean...

    States with pure comparative negligence. In states that follow pure comparative negligence guidelines, all parties involved in an accident are able to claim damages regardless of what percentage ...

  5. Contributory negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributory_negligence

    The classic version of contributory negligence, where a plaintiff who is even 0.01% negligent is barred from recovery, nowadays is referred to as "pure contributory negligence." [3] Some states have adopted a "modified" or "mixed" version of contributory negligence where the plaintiff is only barred from recovery if he or she was more than a ...

  6. Driving without insurance in Louisiana: What you need to know

    www.aol.com/finance/driving-without-insurance...

    Louisiana does have laws regarding fault and comparative negligence. Louisiana applies a pure comparative negligence rule, which means that even if you are partially at fault for an accident, you ...

  7. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  8. Tort reform - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort_reform

    In addition to reforms aimed at limiting plaintiff's abilities to claim particular categories of compensation, tort reform measures aimed at reducing the prevalence of lawsuits for negligence, the most commonly alleged tort, aim to revise the doctrine of comparative negligence. Comparative negligence is a partial legal defence that reduces the ...

  9. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    Comparative negligence – A partial defense that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. Most jurisdictions have adopted this doctrine; those not adopting it are Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, And Washington D.C.