Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The risk-needs-responsivity model is used in criminology to develop recommendations for how prisoners should be assessed based on the risk they present, what programs or services they require, and what kinds of environments they should be placed in to reduce recidivism.
Rational choice modeling has a long history in criminology.This method was designed by Cornish and Clarke to assist in thinking about situational crime prevention. [1] In this context, the belief that crime generally reflects rational decision-making by potential criminals is sometimes called the rational choice theory of crime.
These aspects mould the identity of a person and inflict subconscious psychological effect on everyday behaviour, attitudes and criminogenic needs. [ 5 ] Research over the past five years indicates that a victim of a crime becomes more susceptible to expressing their trauma and/or psychological through violence and aggression.
For example, an owner of a television might be away from their home when a burglar decides to target the television for stealing. The television is the target and the owner's absence indicates the absence of a capable guardian, thereby making the crime more likely according to the theory. [ 8 ]
identify and classify offending-related needs, including basic personality characteristics and cognitive behavioural problems; assess risk of serious harm, risks to the individual and other risks; assist with management of risk of harm; links the assessment to the supervision or sentence plan; indicate the need for further specialist assessments
In criminology, the focal concerns theory, posited in 1962 by Walter B. Miller, attempts to explain the behavior of "members of adolescent street corner groups in lower class communities" as concern for six focal concerns: trouble, toughness, smartness, excitement, fate, and autonomy. [1]
Another early form of the theory was proposed by Reiss (1951) [3] who defined delinquency as, "...behavior consequent to the failure of personal and social controls." ." Personal control was defined as, "...the ability of the individual to refrain from meeting needs in ways which conflict with the norms and rules of the community" while social control was, "...the ability of social groups or ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... A list of 'effects' that have been noticed in the field of psychology. [clarification needed]