Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Bill leads to impassioned arguments ... (End of Life) Bill in the Commons on Friday. A vote must be called before 2.30pm otherwise the bill is highly unlikely to make any further progress through ...
This vote makes clear what we know: the majority of Americans agree that women should have access to abortion and should have the right to make their own health care decisions. In response to the referendum results, several national Democratic Party leaders, including Senators Elizabeth Warren and Brian Schatz , argued that the party's ...
Then you must be pro-reproductive rights, pro-health care, pro-availability of contraceptives, and pro-sex education. Vote no on Amendment #2 like your life depends on it. Because it does.
The story has been largely the same when it comes to the nearly 100 acts of violence and vandalism against pro-life pregnancy resource centers since the draft Dobbs ruling overturning Roe v. Wade ...
The first bill, introduced in 1988, was defeated in the House of Commons. The next year, in 1989, the Mulroney government introduced a bill that would allow abortion only if two doctors certified that the woman's health was in danger. This bill passed the House of Commons but was defeated by a tie vote in the Senate. There have not been any ...
Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America (formerly Susan B. Anthony List) is an American 501(c)(4) non-profit [3] organization that seeks to reduce and ultimately end abortion in the US, [4] by supporting anti-abortion politicians, primarily women, [5] through its SBA Pro-Life America Candidate Fund political action committee.
Jules Good, a disability justice advocate from Newmarket who opposed the bill, said the No. 1 priority is making sure the bill doesn’t get all the way through the legislature.
NARAL Pro-Choice America criticized the amendment, stating it could mean that people whose health insurance currently covers abortions will lose that service. [3] [4] [5] Those who voted against the amendment argued that, because premiums of private individuals would pay for the abortions, they were distinguished from situations covered by the Hyde Amendment.