When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: bemis 1500ec 146 toilet seat reviews consumer reports complaints

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. With a recent recognition on the Deloitte Wisconsin 75 list, the 122-year-old family-owned company wants to get its name out there more.

  3. Bemis Manufacturing Company - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bemis_Manufacturing_Company

    The Bemis Manufacturing Company is an American manufacturing company based in Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin, and is best known for its toilet seat products. Bemis also manufactures suction canisters, sharps containers, fluid management systems, gas caps, gauges and various contracted injection molded plastic parts for companies such as John Deere and Whirlpool Corporation.

  4. Deodorizing toilet seat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deodorizing_toilet_seat

    It works by drawing air from the bowl, thus preventing odors from rising and wafting from the toilet bowl into the bathroom when the toilet is in use. The odors are drawn upwards through the independent overflow pipe within the cistern and then pass through the activated carbon filter, where they are totally eliminated.

  5. Consumer Reports - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_Reports

    Consumer Reports (CR), formerly Consumers Union (CU), is an American nonprofit consumer organization dedicated to independent product testing, investigative journalism, consumer-oriented research, public education, and consumer advocacy.

  6. Toilet seat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_seat

    A toilet seat is a hinged unit consisting of a round or oval open seat, and usually a lid, which is bolted onto the bowl of a toilet used in a sitting position (as opposed to a squat toilet). The seat can be either for a flush toilet or a dry toilet .

  7. Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_Goods_Ass'n,_Inc._v...

    Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 158 (1967), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. It held that judicial review of a regulation's validity was inappropriate because the controversy was not ripe for adjudication. Since it was not clear whether or not an inspection would be ordered and the reasons had not ...