Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Policy debate, different from debating policy plans, is a "pure" values debate about which resolutions are best or better than the given resolution's stated policy goals. The bright-line debate between some of the adversarial groups' modern classical issues is narrow and difficult to debate for the uninitiated debate club.
Pandemic-related stimulus policies put in place by both Trump and Biden were blamed, in part, for the rise in the inflation rate. Fact check: Did Biden lower the cost of insulin to $15 a shot?
The government also called on social media platforms to be more proactive in combatting disinformation by implementing policies. [20] In response to the increase in "false, misleading and inflammatory" online disinformation, the federal government created the Digital Citizen Initiative, to "support democracy and social inclusion in Canada".
The last four speeches of the debate are reserved for refutations of arguments already made. In current policy debate, the "first affirmative constructive" (1AC) is used to present the "plan". Whether all new "off-case arguments" must be presented in the "first negative constructive" is a point of contention. [6] [7]
It’s impossible to reconcile big-government dreams with the reality of the clowns who rule us. Presidential Debate Debacle Was a Great Argument for Smaller Government Skip to main content
Topicality is a resolution issue in policy debate which pertains to whether or not the plan affirms the resolution as worded. [1] To contest the topicality of the affirmative, the negative interprets a word or words in the resolution and argues that the affirmative does not meet that definition, that the interpretation is preferable, and that non-topicality should be a voting issue.
At one time, when false balance was prevalent, news media sometimes reported all positions as though they were equally credible, even though the facts clearly contradicted a position, or there was a substantial consensus on one side of an issue, and only a fringe or nascent theory supporting the other side.
In a democracy, though, political argument is particularly important, since there is a direct relationship between the beliefs of citizens and the structure of power. Moreover, the institutions of democracy in part define the relationships between beliefs and power. In this case, political argument is an important element of political strategy ...