When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: involuntary intoxication defense cases in chicago il state

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intoxication defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intoxication_defense

    In criminal law, the intoxication defense is a defense by which a defendant may claim diminished responsibility on the basis of substance intoxication.Where a crime requires a certain mental state (mens rea) to break the law, those under the influence of an intoxicating substance may be considered to have reduced liability for their actions.

  3. Taylor v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v._Illinois

    Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that defense witnesses can be prevented from testifying under certain circumstances, even if that hurts the defense's case. [1]

  4. List of law enforcement officers convicted for an on-duty ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_enforcement...

    This is a list of law enforcement officers convicted for an on-duty killing in the United States.The listing documents the date the incident resulting in conviction occurred, the date the officer(s) was convicted, the name of the officer(s), and a brief description of the original occurrence making no implications regarding wrongdoing or justification on the part of the person killed or ...

  5. Diminished responsibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminished_responsibility

    Diminished capacity is a partial defense to charges that require that the defendant act with a particular state of mind. [1] For example, if the felony murder rule does not apply, first degree murder requires that the state prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with premeditation, deliberation, and the specific intent to kill ...

  6. Kirby v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirby_v._Illinois

    Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel did not attach during a pre-indictment identification. [1]

  7. Illinois v. Wardlow - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Wardlow

    Illinois v. Wardlow , 528 U.S. 119 (2000), is a case decided before the United States Supreme Court involving U.S. criminal procedure regarding searches and seizures . Background

  8. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    Depending on jurisdiction, circumstances and crime, intoxication may be a defense, a mitigating factor or an aggravating factor. However, most jurisdictions differentiate between voluntary intoxication and involuntary intoxication. [24] In some cases, intoxication (usually involuntary intoxication) may be covered by the insanity defense. [25]

  9. Brown v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Illinois

    Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourth Amendment's protection against the introduction of evidence obtained in an illegal arrest is not attenuated by reading the defendant their Miranda Rights.