Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The exception proves the rule is a phrase that arises from ignorance, though common to good writers. The original word was preuves, which did not mean proves but tests. [4] In this sense, the phrase does not mean that an exception demonstrates a rule to be true or to exist, but that it tests the rule, thereby proving its value.
Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein a person claims an exception to a general or ... Creation of an ad-hoc exception to prevent the rule from backfiring ...
The fallacy of accident (also called destroying the exception or a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid) is an informal fallacy where a general rule is applied to an exceptional case. The fallacy of accident gets its name from the fact that one or more accidental features of the specific case make it an exception to the rule.
Naturalistic fallacy fallacy is a type of argument from fallacy. Straw man fallacy – refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. [110] Texas sharpshooter fallacy – improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data. [111]
Exception that proves the rule; Kompetenz-kompetenz; Legal certainty; Nulla poena sine lege, no penalty without a law; Reserved powers; Rule of law; Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the principle of federalism and states' rights; Vagueness doctrine
Destroying the exception may refer to: Accident (fallacy) , fallacy when an exception to a rule of thumb is ignored Converse accident , fallacy when a rule that applies only to an exceptional case is wrongly applied to all cases in general
A bride-to-be has been defended after she refused to make an exception to her childfree wedding rule.. In a recent post shared to the popular “Am I The A**hole?” Reddit forum, the woman ...
The two arguments imply there is no difference between the exception and the rule, and in fact fallacious slippery slope arguments often use the converse accident to the contrary as the basis for the argument. However, a key difference between the two is the point and position being argued.