Ad
related to: us court of claims decisions pacourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
State officials appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which reversed the Commonwealth Court's decision because the statutes did not set minimum distances for observers. The Trump campaign appealed to the United States Supreme Court on December 20, 2020, but this was dismissed without comment. [20] [21] [22] November 10, 2020: Pirkle v. Wolf
Asked a federal court to overturn the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision allowing the receipt of ballots after Election Day. Dismissed by the Pennsylvania district court, appealed to 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals; dismissed, and appealed to the Supreme Court where it was dismissed without comment on February 22, 2021. [44]
United States in 1933, deciding that the Court of Claims was an Article I or legislative court and so Congress had the authority to reduce the salaries of the judges of the Court of Claims. [ 7 ] Beginning in 1948, Congress directed that when directed by the court, the commissioner could make recommendations for conclusions of law (62 Stat. 976 ).
The 2-1 decision by a three-judge panel reversed a Nov. 21 decision by U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, of the Erie Division of the Pittsburgh-based U.S. District Court for the Western ...
The United States Court of Federal Claims (in case citations, Fed. Cl. or C.F.C.) is a United States federal court that hears monetary claims against the U.S. government.It was established by statute in 1982 as the United States Claims Court, and took its current name in 1992.
Though the court acknowledged that it was possible that a piece of property's value was not quantifiable (citing Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil., 200 U.S. 481, 499; Gould Securities Co. v. United States, 96 F.2d 780) it believed that those circumstances were rare. [3] Therefore, the case was remanded back to the Commissioner to determine the price. [1]
The difference of prosecution and judicial opinions across Pennsylvania centers on the language of unlawful contact with a minor. The statute requires a law enforcement posing as a minor or an ...
Delaware v. Pennsylvania, 598 U.S. 115 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case related to unclaimed money and check escheatment. [1] This case was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's first majority opinion on the Supreme Court. [2] [3] It was also the first case the Supreme Court had taken on unclaimed property in over 30 years. [4]