Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Whether California courts are required by the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution to enforce equitable judgments from courts of other states, having personal jurisdiction over the defendant, that enjoin competition or are contrary to important public interests in California is an issue that has not yet been decided.
Canadian courts will enforce non-competition and non-solicitation agreements; however, the agreement must be limited in time frame, business scope, and geographic scope to what is reasonably required to protect the company's proprietary rights, such as confidential marketing information or client relations [15] and the scope of the agreement ...
Non-compete clauses are automatically void except for a small number of exceptions. Evidence privileges are fully codified in the California Evidence Code (meaning if it is not codified it does not exist), in contrast to the Federal Rules of Evidence , which has allowed a residual exception for continuous development of privileges under the ...
California Civil Code § 3369, enacted in 1872, was California's early unfair competition statute. It "addressed only the availability of civil remedies for business violations in cases of penalty, forfeiture, and criminal violation." [3] A 1933 amendment expanded the law to prohibit "any person [from] performing an act of unfair competition."
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...
It's one of four policy updates announced Wednesday as part of a wider shake-up of Microsoft's corporate culture.
The case was remanded to the Ninth Circuit, which declared the arbitration agreement unconscionable under California law. That precluded arbitration proceedings and allowed Adams to pursue a regular lawsuit in California courts. [10] Adams was then able to pursue the original claims notwithstanding the decision by Justice Kennedy.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us