Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
O'Connor, joined by unanimous. Laws applied. Carriage of Goods by Sea Act. Norfolk Southern Ry. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 543 U.S. 14 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the extent to which maritime bills of lading cover non-maritime portions of a shipment, together with connected clauses for exclusion of liability.
Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd. Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd, also known as the Gove land rights case because its subject was land known as the Gove Peninsula in the Northern Territory, was the first litigation on native title in Australia, and the first significant legal case for Aboriginal land rights in Australia, decided on 27 April 1971.
Albania. In Albania, a limited liability company (Albanian: Shoqëri me përgjegjësi të kufizuar Sh.p.k) is a commercial company founded by persons of physical or judicial status, who are not liable for the company and personally bear losses only up to the outstanding contribution agreements. Partners' contributions constitute the registered ...
Proprietary limited or unlimited company. Under Australian law, a proprietary limited company (abbreviated as 'Pty Ltd') is a business structure that has at least one shareholder and up to 50, where the liability of shareholders is limited to the value of shares. Its counterparts include the public limited company (Ltd) and the Unlimited ...
Brennan J. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales, [1] (" Codelfa ") is a widely cited Australian contract law case, [2] which serves as authority for the modern approach to contractual construction. [3] The case greatly influenced the development of the Eastern Suburbs railway line.
Latec Investments Ltd v Hotel Terrigal Pty Ltd. A mortgagee fraudulently exercised the power of sale. The sale was void against the mortgagee, but the fraud did not affect an equitable charge subsequently granted to a bona fide purchaser. Latec Investments Ltd v Hotel Terrigal Pty Ltd[1] is a 1965 property law decision of the High Court of ...
Bath v Alston Holdings Pty Ltd, [1] is a High Court of Australia case that discusses the application of the freedom of interstate trade, as specified in Section 92 of the Constitution of Australia. This case followed the unanimous decision of Cole v Whitfield , [ 2 ] regarding the interpretation of section 92 as about free trade as opposed to ...
Farah Constructions v Say-Dee Pty Ltd, also known as Farah, is a decision of the High Court of Australia. [1] The case was influential in developing Australian legal doctrines relating to equity, property, unjust enrichment, and constructive trusts, [2] as well as the doctrine of precedent as it applies in Australia. [3]