When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: california warrantless searches on the internet network for short

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Riley v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_v._California

    Diaz (2011) Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. [2][3] The case arose from inconsistent rulings on cell phone searches ...

  3. Warrantless searches in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantless_searches_in...

    Warrantless searches are searches and seizures conducted without court-issued search warrants.. In the United States, warrantless searches are restricted under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not ...

  4. Johnson v. United States (1948 Fourth Amendment case)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._United_States...

    Laws applied. U.S. Const. Amend. IV. Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948), was a significant United States Supreme Court decision addressing search warrants and the Fourth Amendment. In this case, where federal agents had probable cause to search a hotel room but did not obtain a warrant, the Court declared the search was "unreasonable."

  5. She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/she-endured-traumatic-cavity...

    The search warrant explicitly stated that without Cardenas' consent, a body cavity search could be conducted only after X-ray confirmation of a suspected foreign object within her.

  6. Stoner v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoner_v._California

    U.S. Const. amend. IV. Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court decision involving the Fourth Amendment. It was a criminal case appealed from the California Courts of Appeal after the California Supreme Court denied review.

  7. Lange v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_v._California

    Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.

  8. Chimel v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimel_v._California

    Chimel v. California. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]

  9. 'Nothing like this': National Guard rushes supplies to towns ...

    www.aol.com/nothing-national-guard-rushes...

    ASHEVILLE, N.C. − They flew over wastelands of crushed houses, demolished roads and downed power lines. From the air, they could see once pristine mountain forests destroyed by mudslides and ...