When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Declaration against interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_against_interest

    A declaration against interest differs from a party admission because here the declarant does not have to be a party to the case but must have a basis for knowing that the statement is true. [2] Furthermore, evidence of the statement will only be admissible if the declarant is unavailable to testify.

  3. Statement against penal interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statement_against_penal...

    In United States law, a statement against penal interest is a statement that puts the statement-maker at risk of prosecution.It is the criminal equivalent of a statement against interest, a statement a person would not normally make, which would put them in a disadvantaged position that they would have had if they had not made the statement in the first place.

  4. Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

    Declaration against interest: A statement that would incriminate or expose the declarant to liability to such an extent that it can be assumed he would only make such a statement if it were true. It would be assumed that one would lie to further one's interests, so a statement against his interests (such as exposing oneself to criminal or civil ...

  5. Party admission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_admission

    The "statements against interest" rule is different because: It is party neutral (the hearsay exemption is party-specific). The declarant must be unavailable. The statement must be against the penal interest (under federal rules of evidence) or the fiscal or social interest (under the rules of states not following the federal rules). The ...

  6. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements, in the law of evidence, occur where a witness, testifying at trial, makes a statement that is either consistent or inconsistent, respectively, with a previous statement given at an earlier time such as during a discovery, interview, or interrogation.

  7. Proffer agreement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proffer_agreement

    In U.S. criminal law, a proffer agreement, proffer letter, proffer, or "Queen for a Day" letter is a written agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant or prospective witness that allows the defendant or witness to give the prosecutor information about an alleged crime, while limiting the prosecutor's ability to use that information against him or her.

  8. ‘This puts a nail in the coffin’: Kevin O’Leary warns against ...

    www.aol.com/finance/puts-nail-coffin-kevin-o...

    Credit card interest rates stand at a staggering 28.9%. Use this free online tool to pay off your debt ASAP — so you can get unstuck and start building real wealth

  9. Hearsay in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_English_Law

    The Act sets out criteria in determining whether the interests of justice test are met, and provides for consideration of other relevant factors: [28] How much probative value (that is, use in determining the case) the statement has (assuming it to be true), or its value in understanding other evidence;