Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Fairness dilemmas arise when groups are faced with making decisions about how to share their resources, rewards, or payoffs. Since resources are limited, groups need to decide on fair ways of apportioning them out to their members. These fairness judgments are determined by procedural and distributive forms of social justice.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Common fairness criteria, such as proportionality and envy-freeness, judge the division from the point-of-view of a single agent, with a single preference relation. There are several ways to extend these criteria to fair division among groups. Unanimous fairness requires that the allocation be considered fair in the eyes of all agents in all ...
Fair division is the problem in game theory of dividing a set of resources among several people who have an entitlement to them so that each person receives their due share. . That problem arises in various real-world settings such as division of inheritance, partnership dissolutions, divorce settlements, electronic frequency allocation, airport traffic management, and exploitation of Earth ...
No justified envy is a weakening of no-envy for two-sided markets, in which both the agents and the "items" have preferences over the opposite side, e.g., the market of matching students to schools. Student A feels justified envy towards student B, if A prefers the school allocated to B, and at the same time, the school allocated to B prefers A.
Inequity aversion (IA) is the preference for fairness and resistance to incidental inequalities. [1] The social sciences that study inequity aversion include sociology, economics, psychology, anthropology, and ethology. Researchers on inequity aversion aim to explain behaviors that are not purely driven by self-interests but fairness ...
Principlism is an applied ethics approach to the examination of moral dilemmas centering the application of certain ethical principles. This approach to ethical decision-making has been prevalently adopted in various professional fields, largely because it sidesteps complex debates in moral philosophy at the theoretical level.
God's justice is rooted in an unwavering fairness, devoid of favoritism. The epistle to the Colossians further reinforces the notion of impartiality, stating that those who commit wrongdoings will be held accountable for their actions without any partiality based on their personhood.