When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: reliable people in the bible

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Historicity of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

    Scholarly estimates for how many people could have been involved in such an exodus range from a few hundred to a few thousand people. [70] Donald Redford held that the Exodus narrative is a Canaanite memory of the Hyksos' descent and occupation of Egypt. [78] [page needed]

  3. Historical reliability of the Gospels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    The historical reliability of the Gospels is evaluated by experts who have not reached complete consensus. While all four canonical gospels contain some sayings and events that may meet at least one of the five criteria for historical reliability used in biblical studies, [note 1] the assessment and evaluation of these elements is a matter of ongoing debate.

  4. Biblical infallibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_infallibility

    Historically, Jewish and Christian interpreters of the Bible have seen it as reliable and trustworthy, but such views do not equate veracity with historicity, scientificity or even facticity. [2] The idea of biblical infallibility gained ground in Protestant churches as a fundamentalist reaction against a general movement towards modernism ...

  5. Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    It has been claimed that the author of Acts used the writings of Josephus (specifically Antiquities of the Jews) as a historical source. [13] [14] The majority of scholars reject both this claim and the claim that Josephus borrowed from Acts, [15] [16] [17] arguing instead that Luke and Josephus drew on common traditions and historical sources.

  6. List of biblical figures identified in extra-biblical sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_biblical_figures...

    These are biblical figures unambiguously identified in contemporary sources according to scholarly consensus.Biblical figures that are identified in artifacts of questionable authenticity, for example the Jehoash Inscription and the bullae of Baruch ben Neriah, or who are mentioned in ancient but non-contemporary documents, such as David and Balaam, [n 1] are excluded from this list.

  7. Criticism of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible

    Specific collections of biblical writings, such as the Hebrew Bible and Christian Bibles, are considered sacred and authoritative by their respective faith groups. [11] The limits of the canon were effectively set by the proto-orthodox churches from the 1st throughout the 4th century; however, the status of the scriptures has been a topic of scholarly discussion in the later churches.

  8. Historical books - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_books

    The historical books are a division of Christian Bibles, grouping 12 (or in some denominations more) books of the Old Testament. [1] [page needed] It includes the Former Prophets from the Nevi'im and two of the ungrouped books of Ketuvim of the Hebrew Bible together with the Book of Ruth and the Book of Esther which in the Hebrew are both found in the Five Megillot.

  9. Source criticism (biblical studies) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism_(biblical...

    Source criticism, in biblical criticism, refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the authors and redactors of a biblical text. It originated in the 18th century with the work of Jean Astruc, who adapted the methods already developed for investigating the texts of classical antiquity (in particular, Homer's Iliad) to his own investigation into the sources of the Book of Genesis. [1]