Ad
related to: the strong free will theorem calculator 2 decimal numbers 5
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Conway and Kochen, The Strong Free Will Theorem, published in Notices of the AMS. Volume 56, Number 2, February 2009. Rehmeyer, Julie (August 15, 2008). "Do Subatomic Particles Have Free Will?". Science News. Introduction to the Free Will Theorem, videos of six lectures given by J. H. Conway, Mar. 2009. Wüthrich, Christian (September 2011).
[3] [4] For example, if a = 2 and p = 5, then A = 31, B = 11, and n = 341 is a pseudoprime to base 2. In fact, there are infinitely many strong pseudoprimes to any base greater than 1 (see Theorem 1 of [5]) and infinitely many Carmichael numbers, [6] but they are comparatively rare.
They are listed in Table 7 of. [2] The smallest such number is 25326001. This means that, if n is less than 25326001 and n is a strong probable prime to bases 2, 3, and 5, then n is prime. Carrying this further, 3825123056546413051 is the smallest number that is a strong pseudoprime to the 9 bases 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, and 23.
Theorem (A. Korselt 1899): A positive composite integer is a Carmichael number if and only if is square-free, and for all prime divisors of , it is true that .
The problem of free will has been identified in ancient Greek philosophical literature. The notion of compatibilist free will has been attributed to both Aristotle (4th century BCE) and Epictetus (1st century CE): "it was the fact that nothing hindered us from doing or choosing something that made us have control over them".
Input #1: b, the number of bits of the result Input #2: k, the number of rounds of testing to perform Output: a strong probable prime n while True: pick a random odd integer n in the range [2 b −1 , 2 b −1] if the Miller–Rabin test with inputs n and k returns “ probably prime ” then return n
In addition, he derives a number of results from this conjecture, among them Fermat's Last Theorem and the now-proven Taniyama–Weil (or Taniyama–Shimura) conjecture, now known as the modularity theorem (although this implies Fermat's Last Theorem, Serre proves it directly from his conjecture).
By postulating that all systems being measured are correlated with the choices of which measurements to make on them, the assumptions of the theorem are no longer fulfilled. A hidden variables theory which is superdeterministic can thus fulfill Bell's notion of local causality and still violate the inequalities derived from Bell's theorem. [1]