Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The case went all the way up to the Ohio Supreme Court, but Berkheimer never got a jury trial. The court ruled that boneless wings refers to a cooking method and not a guarantee of no bones.
Dec. 11—The Ohio Supreme Court said this week it will not reconsider a local case involving boneless chicken. Diners should still be on guard against chicken bones even in pieces of supposedly ...
But there's still confusion around the terminology "boneless." According to a recent ruling by Ohio's Supreme Court, boneless chicken wings can in fact contain bones.
The term "brokered convention" has referred to a convention whose outcome is decided by superdelegate votes, rather than pledged delegates alone, but that is not the original sense of the term and has not been a commonly-used definition for a "contested convention."
Democrats on the court contended that a jury, not appeals court judges, should decide whether customers should expect to find bones in boneless wings. Boneless chicken wings can have bones, Ohio ...
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that boneless chicken wings can legally contain bones. The court found the term "boneless wings" refers to a style of cooking, and patrons may expect to find bones anyway. The court explained, "A diner reading ‘boneless wings’ on a menu would no more believe that the restaurant was warranting the absence of ...
An Ohio restaurant is not responsible for a customer’s injury after a bone was found in an order of boneless wings, a divided Ohio Supreme Court ruled Thursday, affirming an appellate court’s ...
City of Norwood v. Horney, 110 Ohio St.3d 353 (2006), was a case brought before the Ohio Supreme Court in 2006. The case came upon the heels of Kelo v.City of New London, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that commercial development justified the use of eminent domain.