Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A zero-sum game is also called a strictly competitive game, while non-zero-sum games can be either competitive or non-competitive. Zero-sum games are most often solved with the minimax theorem which is closely related to linear programming duality, [5] or with Nash equilibrium. Prisoner's Dilemma is a classic non-zero-sum game. [6]
Game square (that is, the payoff to player I) for a game with no value, due to Sion and Wolfe. The payoff is 0 along the two diagonal lines. In the mathematical theory of games, in particular the study of zero-sum continuous games, not every game has a minimax value.
In two-player zero-sum games, the minimax solution is the same as the Nash equilibrium. In the context of zero-sum games, the minimax theorem is equivalent to: [4] [failed verification] For every two-person zero-sum game with finitely many strategies, there exists a value V and a mixed strategy for each player, such that
Constant sum: A game is a constant sum game if the sum of the payoffs to every player are the same for every single set of strategies. In these games, one player gains if and only if another player loses. A constant sum game can be converted into a zero sum game by subtracting a fixed value from all payoffs, leaving their relative order unchanged.
Matching Pennies is a zero-sum game because each participant's gain or loss of utility is exactly balanced by the losses or gains of the utility of the other participants. If the participants' total gains are added up and their total losses subtracted, the sum will be zero.
Trading options is a zero-sum game. It’s a bet made between two traders as to what happens to a stock. The gains of the winner exactly offset the losses of the loser, not factoring in costs such ...
The first theorem in this sense is von Neumann's minimax theorem about two-player zero-sum games published in 1928, [2] which is considered the starting point of game theory. Von Neumann is quoted as saying "As far as I can see, there could be no theory of games
If you have 100 shares at $100 or 10 shares at $1,000, it's still the same $10,000 sum. However, it's the perceived value of the market that has drawn companies to declare stock splits in the past.