When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bible citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_citation

    Citations in the APA style add the translation of the Bible after the verse. [5] For example, (John 3:16, New International Version). Translation names should not be abbreviated (e.g., write out King James Version instead of using KJV). Subsequent citations do not require the translation unless that changes.

  3. 2 Corinthians 7 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_Corinthians_7

    2 Corinthians 7 is the seventh chapter of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It is authored by Paul the Apostle and Timothy ( 2 Corinthians 1:1 ) in Macedonia in 55–56 CE.

  4. Second Epistle to the Corinthians - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Epistle_to_the...

    Papyrus 124 contains a fragment of 2 Corinthians (6th century AD). The Second Epistle to the Corinthians [a] is a Pauline epistle of the New Testament of the Christian Bible.The epistle is attributed to Paul the Apostle and a co-author named Timothy, and is addressed to the church in Corinth and Christians in the surrounding province of Achaea, in modern-day Greece. [3]

  5. Wikipedia:Citing sources/Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources/Bible

    Thank you for your response. I have seen the parallel capability, and it is good; however, what I am talking about is the ability to cite one translation alone other than the NET version. e.g. in an article on the Ten Commandments' public use, I might want to cite the King Jamaes Version translation of Exodus 20:2-17. Does the net.bible.org ...

  6. Easy-to-Read Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easy-to-Read_Version

    The ERV caused a slight bit of controversy among a small number of lay members of the Churches of Christ (the WBTC is an outreach of the Churches of Christ).Goebel Music wrote a lengthy book critiquing this translation titled "Easy-to-Read Version: Easy to Read or Easy to Mislead?", criticizing the ERV's method of translation, textual basis, and wording of certain passages. [5]

  7. Amplified Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amplified_Bible

    The Amplified Bible largely offers a word-for-word (formal equivalence) translation, in contrast to thought-for-thought (dynamic equivalence) translations at the opposite end of the Bible translation spectrum. [6] [7] [8] Amplification is indicated by parentheses, brackets, italicized conjunctions, and bold or italicized text. Each form ...

  8. The Voice (Bible translation) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Voice_(Bible_translation)

    The Voice is a modern language, dynamic equivalent English translation of the Bible developed by Thomas Nelson (a subsidiary of News Corp) and the Ecclesia Bible Society.The original New Testament was released in January 2011, [1] the revised and updated New Testament was released in November 2011, [2] and the full Bible was released in April 2012.

  9. BibleGateway - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibleGateway

    Bible Gateway's engagement features include the ability to display a single Bible verse in many English Bible translations, the ability to display and compare up to five Bible translations side by side at once, its daily Blog, more than 60 email devotions, Bible reading plans and verses-of-the-day, a free mobile app, audio Bibles, video ...