Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
However, formal psychometric analysis, called item analysis, is considered the most effective way to increase reliability. This analysis consists of computation of item difficulties and item discrimination indices, the latter index involving computation of correlations between the items and sum of the item scores of the entire test. If items ...
Different reliability coefficients ranked first in each simulation study [42] [43] [6] [44] [45] comparing the accuracy of several reliability coefficients. [ 7 ] The majority opinion is to use structural equation modeling or SEM -based reliability coefficients as an alternative to ρ T {\displaystyle \rho _{T}} .
It is possible to calculate the extent to which the two scales overlap by using the following formula where is correlation between x and y, is the reliability of x, and is the reliability of y: r x y r x x ⋅ r y y {\displaystyle {\cfrac {r_{xy}}{\sqrt {r_{xx}\cdot r_{yy}}}}}
Generalizability theory, or G theory, is a statistical framework for conceptualizing, investigating, and designing reliable observations.It is used to determine the reliability (i.e., reproducibility) of measurements under specific conditions.
This is not the same as reliability, which is the extent to which a measurement gives results that are very consistent. Within validity, the measurement does not always have to be similar, as it does in reliability. However, just because a measure is reliable, it is not necessarily valid. E.g. a scale that is 5 pounds off is reliable but not valid.
Predicted reliability, ′, is estimated as: ′ = ′ + ′ where n is the number of "tests" combined (see below) and ′ is the reliability of the current "test". The formula predicts the reliability of a new test composed by replicating the current test n times (or, equivalently, creating a test with n parallel forms of the current exam).
Cohen's kappa measures the agreement between two raters who each classify N items into C mutually exclusive categories. The definition of is =, where p o is the relative observed agreement among raters, and p e is the hypothetical probability of chance agreement, using the observed data to calculate the probabilities of each observer randomly selecting each category.
A quantity similar (but not mathematically equivalent) to congeneric reliability first appears in the appendix to McDonald's 1970 paper on factor analysis, labeled . [2] In McDonald's work, the new quantity is primarily a mathematical convenience: a well-behaved intermediate that separates two values.