When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibb_v._Navajo_Freight...

    Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. , 359 U.S. 520 (1959), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Illinois law requiring trucks to have unique mudguards was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause .

  3. Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rimini_Street_Inc._v...

    This page was last edited on 13 September 2023, at 03:00 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  4. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pike_v._Bruce_Church,_Inc.

    State statutes that have a negative effect on interstate commerce are unconstitutional under the Dormant Commerce Clause.Justice Stewart used a balancing test.. Where the statute regulates evenhandedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in ...

  5. Bibb Manufacturing Company - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibb_Manufacturing_Company

    Bibb Manufacturing Company was a textile company founded in Macon, Georgia, in 1876 and was sold to Dan River in 1998. Bibb Manufacturing Company, also known as "The Bibb Company" produced cotton products such as sheets, comforters, towels, curtains, and bedspreads.

  6. Bibb County’s 2025 school budget would give teachers raises ...

    www.aol.com/bibb-county-2025-school-budget...

    The Bibb County Board of Education has tentatively approved a 2025 budget that would give raises to all employees in the school system, but opposition to the budget arose due to tax concerns.

  7. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wabash,_St._Louis_&_Pacific...

    The case was argued on April 14, 1886 - April 15, 1886 and was decided on October 25, 1886, by vote of 6 to 3. Associate Justice Miller wrote for the Court with Associate Justices Field, Harlan, Woods, Matthews, and Blatchford concurring; Associate Justices Bradley and Gray, along with Chief Justice Waite, dissented.

  8. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_Paper_Bag_Co...

    Case history; Prior: 150 F. 741 (1st Cir. 1906): Holding; It was not unreasonable for a patent owner to use existing equipment embodying old technology rather than to build new machines using new patents.

  9. KVOS v. Associated Press - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVOS_v._Associated_Press

    KVOS v. Associated Press, 299 U.S. 269 (1936), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held an association of newspapers cannot sue collectively to raise their projected damages above the minimum damages required for federal jurisdiction when only individual newspapers are parties to unfair competition.