Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Response times were similar to my then 60Hz LCD monitor and it was visible at 60fps. At >100fps games ran much much better and visibly sharper, though not as much improvement as on faster panel like the LG I currently have. 27" 1440p 144Hz is currently a gaming sweet spot.
Aug 15, 2005. Messages. 8,201. Mad Maxx said: I expect to get at least 5 years out of the new CPU. I agree. For gaming performance, its basically a 2 gen improvement. Maybe even closer to 3. We'll see, once the 5090 is available to show the full performance of the 9800X3D.
At full resolution text, icons and desktop app in general will be too much little and unreadable. To solve this problem we can use OS scaling, windows offer this function by "zooming the desktop" to 125%, 150% and so on. Zooming desktop produces blurred images because it effectively scales the desktop, like scaling a small image in a bigger one ...
2 [H]4U. FOV is almost always tied to aspec ratio of the screen resolution. 2560x1440 is a 16:9 aspect ratio, 1920x1200 is a 16:10 aspect ratio, the games will alter the FOV to compensate for these different ratios. All games support 16:9 properly cause that is the console FOV.
I am in the unfortunate position that my trusty Viewsonic GF90+ is starting to exhibit loss of brightness and focus shift, and so am considering biting the bullet on an LCD despite not yet coming across one which I find acceptable in terms of response rate, color reproduction and pixel density...
The U2713H is only good for use with color manged programs for work after calibration. It sucks for gaming & watching movies due to the high input lag (30ms) & obvious overshoot ghosting vs. competiors. It does have a game mode with low lag but the color settings are locked & it uses the...
32” as a size is great for gaming. Better than 27” imho. The biggest issue with 32” so far is the res/refresh rate. 4k 32” is 60hz and the panels are not optimized for the fastest response time. WQHD 32” is good for gaming if there is a high refresh rate available but feels a little low dpi for desktop use.
Sancus said: What's wrong with the Innolux panel based models eg Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD and Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD. 1200:1 contrast and respectable response times (~6ms at 144hz, 9-10ms below). No it's not as good as G-sync, but G-sync monitors are always better than Freesync anyways. It's still pretty good.
I have a Samsung UHD TV as a monitor (Q7F). Native 4K obviously looks best, but 1440p can look decent in some games. This TV also runs at 120Hz for 1440p or 1080p which makes it an enticing trade. However, the quality can vary greatly by game. Left4Dead, for example, looks great at 1440p and honestly there is little quality loss.
For gaming, 1080p is a bit on the low side for 27" at 81.59 ppi, while 27" 1440p is 108.79 ppi, which is a noticeable improvement. This is why you're seeing so many 27" 1440p monitors now; 1080p is the standard for 24" monitors, 1440p is the standard for 27" monitors. In terms of size of the screen, here's how a 24" 16:9 and a 27" 16:9 comparison.